In the past, schools had not adapted technology whereas now, it is stated that schools should integrate as much technology as possible in the classroom. AGREE DISAGREE
Versi 5.0
The notion that schools should adopt technology is something that is supported by many experts in education field. Despite what others may think, I believe that it is not a wise idea, hence my disagreement on it.
First of all, integrating technology would absorb a large proportion of financial that can be used more wisely in education. For example, recently Indonesia bought a chrome book for more than 7 trillion rupiahs. It is my belief that this purchase would not change any outcome of education, be it in primary education or secondary education, because the teachers are neglected and considered as unimportant.
If, on the other hand, the money is used to build more facilities that can support education such as better classroom, or laboratory or toilets, it will make the learning environment much better and improve the atmosphere of learning in the classroom. In addition, teachers’ salary should be increased significantly so that they can focus on teaching and do not need to look for other jobs just to make end meet.
Finally, the majority of teachers in remote areas are still spending risky ways just to reach the school itself. The money should be used to guarantee the safety of both teachers and students so that every day is not a gambling risk and serious threat for their lives and safety. If something can be done for the advancement of transportation for our teachers, this will result a much better teaching output in the classroom. The same can also be said about the students.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree that technology is a must have in Indonesian classroom. In my view, despite the promise of benefits in integrating technology in our education system, the real transformation should be assigned in increasing the comfort level of the classroom, the competence of our teachers and the safety of both teachers and students.
Versi 6.5
The notion that schools should adopt technology is supported by many experts in the education field. Despite what others may think, I believe that this is not a wise approach, and I strongly disagree with this proposition.
First of all, integrating technology would absorb a large proportion of educational funding that could be utilized more effectively elsewhere. For example, Indonesia recently purchased Chromebooks for more than 7 trillion rupiahs. In my opinion, this expenditure will not significantly improve educational outcomes, whether in primary or secondary education, because teachers remain neglected and undervalued in the system.
Instead, if this money were used to build better facilities that support education—such as improved classrooms, laboratories, or sanitation facilities—it would create a much better learning environment and enhance the classroom atmosphere. Additionally, teachers’ salaries should be increased significantly so that they can focus entirely on teaching without needing to seek additional employment to make ends meet.
Furthermore, the majority of teachers in remote areas still face dangerous conditions just to reach their schools. Government funding should prioritize ensuring the safety of both teachers and students so that attending school does not become a daily gamble with their lives. If improvements could be made to transportation infrastructure for educators, this would result in much better teaching performance in the classroom. The same benefits would apply to students as well.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree that technology is essential in Indonesian classrooms. In my view, despite the promised benefits of integrating technology into our education system, genuine transformation should focus on increasing classroom comfort, enhancing teacher competence, and ensuring the safety of both educators and students.
